![]() ![]() Rise of the Rocket Launcher argued that the British Army should forward mount Special Observers during rising tensions into high-risk environments. There are compelling arguments stemming from Ukraine for fewer humans and more technology. You can never replace the person in the loop… In these battles, striking Russian air defence and electronic warfare systems with long range rockets allowed for the use of organic uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) to control and accurately deliver close support artillery. ![]() The shaping of an ‘anti-climactic’ close fight allowed the manoeuvre arms to mount various successful counter-offensives, seen in both the Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts. ![]() The Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) have correctly employed the gifted British M270 and American HIMARS rocket launchers in the deep battle. This article updates the core arguments presented with observations from Ukraine. ![]() Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has validated the argument for re-focusing the British Army’s around a core of rocket launchers. The premise of the argument was that the future of conventional warfare would be rocket centred and rely heavily on the use of rocket artillery to deliver decisive blows in the deep battle. It’s been over a year since the release of ‘ Rise of the Rocket Launcher: End of the Armored Division’. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |